Disqovr vs Olive
The short answer
Olive and Disqovr overlap more than any other pair on this list: both run a structured RFP and score vendors against criteria. The difference is shape. Olive presents itself as an eSourcing and RFP platform, including reverse auctions — tooling for a procurement-run sourcing event. Disqovr is a guided six-phase selection process built for the team that has to live with the software, starting with a stakeholder requirements survey and ending with end-user testing on the finalists.
What Disqovr does
A guided, six-phase software selection that ends in a weighted, auditable decision.
What Olive does
eSourcing and RFP management, including reverse auctions.
Disqovr vs Olive, side by side
| Disqovr | Oliveas they position it | |
|---|---|---|
| Shape of the process | Six named phases — Define, Discover, Demonstrate, Decide, Deliver, Determine — that a first-time buyer can follow without a consultant. | Positioned as an eSourcing / RFP platform: you run a sourcing event. |
| Where requirements come from | A shareable stakeholder survey scores each capability on importance and current satisfaction, then auto-prioritises into a Must / Should / Could / Won’t baseline that drives the RFI. | Outside how they describe their product. Ask them how requirements are gathered before the RFP goes out, and whether end users contribute. |
| Reverse auctions | Not offered, and not planned. Our buyer is a mid-market team choosing a system, not a procurement function running an auction. | Describes reverse auctions as part of its sourcing toolkit. |
| Vendor experience | Vendors answer a capability grid in a portal branded as yours. No account to create. | Outside how they describe their product. Ask them what a supplier has to sign up for in order to respond. |
| Before you sign | End users score the shortlisted tools against real tasks during trial or sandbox access, aggregated by role or team so you see where power users and occasional users disagree. | Outside how they describe their product. Ask them how a trial or proof-of-concept is captured as comparable evidence. |
| What comes out | One weighted composite score, every point traceable to an individual response, plus a business case and a board-ready export. | Outside how they describe their product. Ask them what the final decision artefact looks like and who it is written for. |
| Pricing | A flat monthly subscription for the whole workspace, billed monthly or annually — never per user. Each tier includes a set number of active projects; every tier and its price is on our pricing page, and you can start a 14-day free trial with no card and no sales call. A tier priced “Custom” is quoted on a call. | Ask them — we do not quote another vendor’s pricing. |
The right-hand column describes how each product positions itself, reviewed June 2026. It is not an audit of their software, and product scope changes — check anything that matters to your decision with the vendor directly. If we have got something wrong, tell us and we will fix it.
When Olive is the better choice
- You are a procurement function running formal sourcing events, and a reverse auction is a tool you actually use.
- Your process is competitive bidding on largely-defined requirements rather than working out what the requirements are.
- You need eSourcing across categories well beyond software.
When Disqovr is the better choice
- The people who will use the system need a structured say before the shortlist exists, not after.
- Nobody on the team has run a formal evaluation before and you want the process to lead you.
- You have to show a board — or a losing supplier — exactly how the decision was reached.
Ask both vendors these
We will not tell you what another product cannot do. These are the questions that actually separate them — put them to us and to Olive, and compare the answers.
- 1How do requirements enter the process, and do end users contribute to them as data or as opinion?
- 2What does a vendor have to create an account for in order to respond?
- 3Can a stakeholder who is not a procurement specialist run this unaided?
- 4What is the exported decision record, and would it survive a challenge from a losing supplier?
Common questions
- Is Disqovr an alternative to Olive?
- Yes — this is the closest comparison on our list. Both run a structured RFP and score vendors against weighted criteria. Olive positions itself as an eSourcing and RFP platform including reverse auctions; Disqovr is a guided six-phase selection process aimed at the team that will use the software, which begins with a stakeholder requirements survey and ends with end-user testing on the finalists.
- Does Disqovr run reverse auctions?
- No, and it is not on the roadmap. Reverse auctions suit a procurement function running a formal sourcing event. Disqovr is built for a mid-market team choosing a system it has to live with, where the hard part is agreeing what good looks like rather than driving the price down at the close.
- Do I need a procurement team to use Disqovr?
- No. The six phases are designed so an IT, HR, ops or finance lead running their first formal evaluation can follow them without a consultant. Procurement-led teams use it too, for the audit trail and the level playing field it gives every supplier.
Other comparisons
See it on your own evaluation
Start free — no credit card — or ask for a live walkthrough with the founders.