Disqovr vs Loopio
The short answer
Loopio and Disqovr are on opposite sides of the same RFP. Loopio is built for the team answering it — a vendor’s proposal writers, reusing past answers from a library. Disqovr is built for the team issuing it — the buyer comparing vendors and choosing between them. If you are responding to RFPs, Disqovr is not your tool. If you are running the evaluation, Loopio is not yours.
What Disqovr does
Buyer-side software selection — issuing the questionnaire, scoring the answers, making the decision.
What Loopio does
Response management — helping a vendor answer RFPs, RFIs and security questionnaires faster.
Disqovr vs Loopio, side by side
| Disqovr | Loopioas they position it | |
|---|---|---|
| Which side of the table | The buyer. You are choosing between vendors. | Positioned at the vendor. You are being chosen between. |
| Core artefact | A weighted comparison across vendors and a decision record you can defend. | Positioned around a library of reusable answers and a finished response. |
| Answer library | Not offered. Disqovr gives your vendors a portal to answer your RFI in; it is not a library for a vendor’s own proposal team. | Describes a reusable answer library as central to the product. |
| Scoring | Weighted scoring across demos, RFI responses and end-user testing, with variance analysis where scorers disagree. | Outside how they describe their product. Ask them what scoring means on the response side, if anything. |
| Pricing | A flat monthly subscription for the whole workspace, billed monthly or annually — never per user. Each tier includes a set number of active projects; every tier and its price is on our pricing page, and you can start a 14-day free trial with no card and no sales call. A tier priced “Custom” is quoted on a call. | Ask them — we do not quote another vendor’s pricing. |
The right-hand column describes how each product positions itself, reviewed June 2026. It is not an audit of their software, and product scope changes — check anything that matters to your decision with the vendor directly. If we have got something wrong, tell us and we will fix it.
When Loopio is the better choice
- You sell software and your team writes RFP responses — this is unambiguously their job, not ours.
- Your bottleneck is answering the same security questionnaire for the twentieth time.
When Disqovr is the better choice
- You are the buyer, issuing the questionnaire and comparing what comes back.
- You need every vendor answering the same questions in the same structure so the comparison is like for like.
Ask both vendors these
We will not tell you what another product cannot do. These are the questions that actually separate them — put them to us and to Loopio, and compare the answers.
- 1Which side of the RFP is this product built for?
- 2Who is the licence holder — the buyer or the supplier?
- 3If we are the buyer, how do vendors respond, and what does it cost them?
Common questions
- Is Disqovr an alternative to Loopio?
- No. They serve opposite sides of the same document. Loopio is response-side: it helps a vendor answer RFPs faster using a library of past answers. Disqovr is buyer-side: it helps you write the questionnaire, collect structured answers from every vendor and score them into a decision.
- Can vendors use Disqovr to answer our RFI?
- Yes — that is exactly what the vendor portal is for. Each vendor gets a branded portal, answers a structured capability grid, and needs no account to do it. What Disqovr does not give them is a reusable answer library for their own proposal team.
- We are a vendor. Should we buy Disqovr?
- Not for responding to RFPs — that is not what it does. If your software appears in our vendor directory you can claim and verify the listing free, which is how buyers running evaluations find and shortlist you.
Other comparisons
See it on your own evaluation
Start free — no credit card — or ask for a live walkthrough with the founders.